[examples/openspending] - openspending v0.2 (#907)
* [examples/openspending] - openspending v0.2 * [examples/openspending][m] - fix build * [examples/openspending][xs] - fix build * [examples/openspending][xs] - add prebuild step * [examples/openspending][m] - fix requested by demenech * [examples/openspending][sm] - remove links + fix bug
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
lead: true
|
||||
title: Open Knowledge Foundation Greece
|
||||
authors:
|
||||
- Neil Ashton
|
||||
---
|
||||
<div class="well">Project: Tracing financial reporting from the Cl@rity program.</div>
|
||||
*This project review is based on the detailed review of Thodoris
|
||||
Papadopoulos, Open Knowledge Foundation Greece, Local Group.*
|
||||
|
||||
Open Knowledge Foundation Greece is monitoring the financial reporting systems in
|
||||
Greece during the financial crisis, resulting in detailed reviews of
|
||||
the rapid legal and technical changes in the Greek financial
|
||||
reporting system. This has ultimately lead to several proposals for technical changes to the reporting standards.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## About the project
|
||||
|
||||
In Greece, the most important piece of legislation in recent years
|
||||
regarding the transparency of government action is the [Cl@rity](http://diavgeia.gov.gr/) (Diavgeia)
|
||||
program, which introduced the obligation to publish all the decisions of
|
||||
government and all administrative entities on the Internet.
|
||||
Cl@rity aims to generate maximum
|
||||
accessibility of government policy and administrative actions. Since the
|
||||
programme was launched in October 2010, almost 6 million administrative
|
||||
decisions have been uploaded to the Cl@rity website, with a daily
|
||||
average of 14,000 decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
With the Cl@rity program, the enforceability of any administrative act
|
||||
presupposes a previous announcement on the Internet. Furthermore,
|
||||
Cl@rity provides an open data API in XML and JSON formats through which
|
||||
everyone can have structured access to all decisions, along with their
|
||||
metadata, ensuring openness and further dissemination of public
|
||||
information.
|
||||
|
||||
The Cl@rity initiative has already had a quiet but significant
|
||||
effect on the way authorities handle their executive power. It leaves
|
||||
considerably less room for corruption and exposes it much more easily
|
||||
when it takes place, since any citizen or interested party can openly
|
||||
access any questionable acts. This is a scheme of “collective scrutiny”
|
||||
that can be effective, since it allows citizens directly involved or
|
||||
concerned with an issue to scrutinize it in depth rather than leaving
|
||||
it to the traditional media, whose choice of issues often is restricted
|
||||
and oriented towards “safe” topics.
|
||||
|
||||
## Challenges
|
||||
|
||||
Although Cl@rity was not designed with financial monitoring in mind, it
|
||||
includes various decision types that includes financial metadata
|
||||
(such as expenditure, budget, and contract data). From the onset, however,
|
||||
the Cl@rity programme has suffered from issues of poor data quality, including:
|
||||
|
||||
* Failure to provide a hierarchy of entities
|
||||
* Lack of validation rules for metadata fields and non-mandatory
|
||||
requirements
|
||||
|
||||
In reality, these issues have prevented citizens and journalists from
|
||||
utilizing the full potential of the Cl@rity program as a platform for
|
||||
public financial data.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project results
|
||||
|
||||
Open Knowledge Foundation Greece highlights two major achievements from their data quality review and proposals:
|
||||
|
||||
1. For the Cl@rity programme, substantial improvements have been
|
||||
implemented by the end of 2012. These corrections included changes
|
||||
of significant importance to journalists and CSOs, such as improving
|
||||
the quality of transactional spending data.
|
||||
2. For a supplementary information system to support the Cl@rity
|
||||
program, several suggestions brought forward by Open Knowledge Foundation Greece have been
|
||||
admitted to the data architecture. The new system will for this
|
||||
reason be more responsive and accurate and will provide a more detailed
|
||||
data model with many more metadata fields. The new system is
|
||||
expected to be delivered by the end of 2013. The owner of the system
|
||||
the [Greek Ministry of Administrative Reform and
|
||||
e-Governance](http://www.ydmed.gov.gr/) has undertaken to provide
|
||||
the source code of the system through the [European Open Source
|
||||
Observatory and
|
||||
Repository](http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor/description) under
|
||||
a [EUPL](http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/page/eupl) licence.
|
||||
|
||||
### Links about reuse of this data
|
||||
|
||||
* A [short video]((https://vimeo.com/46543472)) about researchers at the National Technical University
|
||||
of Athens and Students of WebScience and active members of OKFN
|
||||
Greece from the University of Thessaloniki
|
||||
* PublicSpending.gr (currently unavailable due to maintenance), also
|
||||
documented in [this academic
|
||||
article](http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2193600)
|
||||
* [http://greekspending.com/](http://greekspending.com/)
|
||||
|
||||
**Next**: [EU Spending Data](../eu-spending-data/)
|
||||
|
||||
**Up**: [Case Studies: Spending](../)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user